Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness

Internet-supported Learning Study

A-HEC Home
Internet-supported Learning Self Evaluation
Best Practices in Internet-Supported Learning in Education
Books to Read
Institutional Participants and Sponsors
Open Source in Higher Education Research
Donate to A-HEC
Inquire


Internet-Supported Learning Self-Audit Study 2005: A Collaborative Approach to Improving Quality and Success
November 2005
by Rob Abel, Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness
Read the report online by clicking on the figure or table entry below
Read the paper: What's Next in Learning Technology in Higher Education?
Click here to learn how to participate in the IsL Self-Audit process!
Figure 1. Example success factors radar chart for an IsL participant p7
Figure 2. The A-HEC participatory evaluation culture of inquiry p8
Figure 3. Participant institution categories p11
Figure 4. Participant institution operating budgets p12
Figure 5. Types of students served p12
Figure 6. Types of programs benchmarked p12
Figure 7. Predominant type of course delivery focus p13
Figure 8. Mix of course types supported p13
Figure 9. Mix of synchronous and asynchronous course delivery p13
Figure 10. Time since first enrollments in participating initiatives p14
Table 1. Internet-supported learning definitions p14
Figure 11. Online enrollments versus initiative maturity p15
Figure 12. Total IsL score versus initiative maturity p16
Figure 13. IsL certifications p17
Figure 14. Total IsL mean scores for all participants p19
Figure 15. Delivery format focus of IsL initiatives p20
Figure 16. IsL enrollments versus IsL total score for entire field p21
Figure 17. IsL enrollments versus IsL total score by peer group p22
Figure 18. IsL mean scores by success factor and peer group p23
Table 2. High to low IsL success factors by peer group p24
Figure 19. Most important motivation - entire field p25
Figure 20. Most important measure of success - entire field p27
Figure 21. Single most important accomplishment across entire field p29
Figure 22. Most needed improvement across entire field p30
Table 3. Ranking of most important improvement by peer group p31
Table 4. Rating of major factors on IsL initiative in the next three years p33
Table 5. Common profiles of the three major IsL ranking categories by success factor p35
Table of Contents Next Section
Our Sponsors Support the Non-Profit Mission of A-HEC . . . . .
Read More About Our Sponsors . . . . .

Copyright 2004-10 Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness All Rights Reserved