|
Institutional Performance Obligation
|
Attendant Performance Indicators
|
|
Learning accountability: Account quantitatively for the quality of learning outcomes, where possible through comparative benchmarking across time of
· retention, persistence, and graduation rates (expected versus actual rates) among comparable institutions, and
· broadly accepted independent learning assessments in the large-enrollment courses commonly taught at almost all comparable institutions.
|
· Participation in the Collegiate Learning Assessment, the National Survey of Student Engagement, or the Community College Survey of Student Engagement
· Independent outcomes assessment of developmental courses, college-level basic skills coursesin math, Spanish, writing, etc.and the five highest-enrollment introductory-level disciplinary & professional courses
· Expected rate vs. actual rate for key indicators such as retention, persistence, and graduation
|
|
Program accountability: Account for any mission obligations to respond rapidly to economic development priorities and workforce/professional education priorities by redesigning or developing academic programs to address these priorities.
|
· Percentage of annual student FTE increase directly attributable to programs created or redesigned to meet identified economic development or workforce needsfor teachers, nurses, biotech workers, etc
· Percentage of annual increase in non-credit enrollments directly attributable to programs created or redesigned to meet identified economic development or workforce needsfor teachers, nurses, biotech workers, etc.
· Percentage of all degrees awarded that are directly attributable to programs created or redesigned to meet identified economic development or workforce needsfor teachers, nurses, biotech workers, etc.
|
|
Expense accountability: Account for the direct expense of instruction and other key lines of serviceIT services, registrarial services, financial services, and so onusing per-student FTE, per-enrollment, or other appropriate unit measures of direct expenses.
|
· Per-enrollment direct instructional expenses and average ratio of enrollments to instructional personnel for development courses, college-level basic skills coursesin math, Spanish, writing, etc.and the five highest-enrollment introductory disciplinary & professional courses
· Per-student-FTE central IT expense and IT personnel (full-time & part-time) expense
· Similar unit expenses metrics in other lines of service
· Percentage of change in the annual ratio of student FTEs to administrative FTEs
|
|
Affordability of access: Maintain affordable access to academic programs (within mission responsibilities) by limiting the rate of any annual tuition and fee increases to the Consumer Price Index.
|
· Ratio of the annual rate of change in undergraduate tuition/fees to the annual Consumer Price Index
· Ratio of per-FTE revenues from tuition/fees and subsidies/grants to per FTE direct operational expenses
|
|
Convenience of access: Provide flexible, integrated access to academic programs and comprehensive support servicesflex programs and servicesby combining online (asynchronous) self-service course and service options with as-wanted expert help via walk-in service centers and a 24x7x365 call center.
|
· Percentage of all degree programs which can be delivered asynchronously except for required clinical or lab work
· Percentage of all non-credit programs which can be delivered asynchronously except for required clinical or lab work
· Annual inventory of services accessible asynchronously via a web portal
|
|
Capacity for access: Adjust institutional capacity after projecting demand for access to pre-requisite and priority courses, academic programs, and other services that are critical to mission fulfillment.
|
· Percentage of qualified applicants refused admission or admitted with delay
· Annual percentage change in total credit hours and in total non-credit enrollments
· Total first-term enrollments (credit & non-credit)
· Ratio of total first-term credit hours to total first-term instructional personnel FTEs and of total first-term non-credit enrollments to total first-term instructional personnel FTEs
· Ratio of total annual enrollments to total seating capacity of the classroom plant
|