Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness
Interview with Arthur Lendo
Home
About A-HEC
A-HEC In-Depth
A-HEC Dimensions
E-Learning Study
Sponsor A-HEC
Inquire
Must Read Books
How Focusing on The Intelligent Education Consumer and Establishing Clear Priorities Can Lead to New Opportunities


Student and Faculty Needs

A-HEC: Many institutions and pundits are in what seems like an endless debate on whether a student can also be a customer.  At Peirce there are no qualms about the student being the customer.  How have you managed to achieve such strong alignment on this key point that is elusive at other institutions?

AL: Framing the discussion is very important to achieving alignment.  At Peirce we view students as "intelligent education consumers".  The average age of a Peirce student is 34 years young.  We are concerned with providing services to meet their needs, while never sacrificing academic integrity.  So, we choose to use this terminology, which seems to be easily understood and embraced, as opposed to using the term customer.

A-HEC: How do you recommend getting accurate, actionable feedback from the students/consumers?

AL: We utilize multiple instruments, including advisory groups and course feedback.  Perhaps what is different about Peirce is that we have dedicated program advisors that provide ongoing, hands-on relationship management with students and the student feedback is reviewed at least monthly by our Chief Operating Officer.  We do not have a Provost at Peirce.  The Chief Operating Office presides over the academic operations.

A-HEC: At Peirce you have implemented a very effective “Program Advisor Model” to address the needs of distance students.  Do these advisors also help place students into jobs, and, is that something that the for-profits do that non-profits should consider emulating?  Is this the ultimate “outcomes assessment” or do you have other measurements you focus on?

AL: Most of our students are working adults and therefore are already employed.  Economically our students measure return through raises and promotions, which may come immediately or down the road.  Such events are difficult to measure.  However, we are beginning implementation of a Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system to enable us to track our graduate’s progress.  We think the application of CRM in higher education will be important in the future.
 
Outcomes assessment is a cornerstone of the Peirce academic offerings, Peirce has moved expeditiously to embrace and implement the assessment guidelines of our accreditors.  One of our motivations to move faster on this than most institutions has been to deliver on our value proposition of the same quality across all delivery lines. 

A-HEC: How important is keeping Peirce programs fresh, current, and practical to their success in the market and are there secrets to making sure that happens?  Who has responsibility for this?

AL: Since our focus is on four-year practical baccalaureate programs, by definition we must stay on the leading edge.  Besides the operational approach of program advisors and review by our COO, my office is directly responsible for strategic planning and positioning.  At Peirce, ultimate authority rests with the board of trustees.  The role of the faculty in academics is key, but the strategic direction of our institution is not delegated.

A-HEC: If I understand correctly, at Peirce the faculty are non-tenured.  Being very familiar with the tenure system yourself, how would you describe how this impacts Peirce’s relationship with its faculty and academic freedom as perceived by the faculty?

AL: Peirce is a non-tenure environment with accreditation.  This places us among a small group of higher learning institutions in the U.S.  During my tenor we have worked to make employee development a top priority and implement a leading edge professional development process that the faculty actively participated in developing.  All employees at Peirce, faculty or staff, are reviewed annually to measure their progress against their plan and rewarded on merit.   Again, framing the discussion is key.  While faculty and employees have rights, they have come to recognize that the college also has rights to insure we are meeting the needs of students.  In the end analysis we believe that our faculty and other employees are very satisfied with their relationship with Peirce and it compares favorably with other options.

----------------------------------

"At Peirce we view students as intelligent education consumers."

----------------------------------

"Perhaps what is different about Peirce is that we have dedicated program advisors that provide ongoing, hands-on relationship management with students and the student feedback is reviewed at least monthly by our Chief Operating Officer."
 

----------------------------------

"During my tenor we have worked to make employee development a top priority and implement a leading edge professional development process that the faculty actively participated in developing.  All employees at Peirce, faculty or staff, are reviewed annually to measure their progress against their plan and rewarded on merit."

----------------------------------

"At Peirce, ultimate authority rests with the board of trustees.  The role of the faculty in academics is key, but the strategic direction of our institution is not delegated."

----------------------------------

Click Here to download the entire interview

----------------------------------

Table of Contents

Go To Next Page

Introduction

Mission, Achieving Focus

Student and Faculty Needs

Market Issues

Interview Home

----------------------------------

Like this Interview?

----------------------------------

Copyright 2004 Alliance for Higher Education Competitiveness All Rights Reserved